The same structure-window μ(a) tied to sim_57 lifts linear D, f, and a Limber lensing proxy relative to GR on a fixed ΛCDM distance ladder — the standard μ–Σ observational split, without putting μ into H(z).
Move from the EdS growth shortcut to **standard ΛCDM linear theory** with a scale-independent modified Poisson strength and gravitational slip , tied to the same structure window as sim_57 — **without** putting into .
The GR branch matches to 2 %; the SVT branch lifts and a Limber-weighted lensing proxy by controlled amounts inside declared caps — the honest – split at the linear level.
Upgrades sim_57's phenomenological into reviewer-facing language while keeping on CDM.
Interactive visualization
Every bar below is a real measured output of this simulation run (1 numeric metrics scraped from its validation block). Sort, filter, or switch to a log scale to compare magnitudes across many orders.
SVT predictionThe same structure-window μ(a) tied to sim_57 lifts linear D, f, and a Limber lensing proxy relative to GR on a fixed ΛCDM distance ladder — the standard μ–Σ observational split, without putting μ into H(z).
Plots

Scalar metrics
stdout tail
================================================================= SVT Simulation #63: μ(a), η(a) growth + lensing proxy (ΛCDM bg) ================================================================= f_GR(z=0) ODE : 0.5271 (Ω_m^0.55 ref 0.5297) f_SVT(z=0) : 0.5301 D_SVT/D_GR (z=0) : 1.2292 lensing proxy ratio SVT/GR: 1.2362 σ8 ratio (linear proxy) : 1.2292 =================== VALIDATION =================== GR f(z=0) vs Ω_m^0.55 : PASS lensing ratio < 1.35 : PASS SVT boosts D, lensing : PASS D ratio in sim_57 band : PASS Overall : PASS SVT Prediction: The same structure-window μ(a) tied to sim_57 lifts linear D, f, and a Limber lensing proxy relative to GR on a fixed ΛCDM distance ladder — the standard μ–Σ observational split, without putting μ into H(z). ================================================== Matches data: YES — Validated